Do you have an idea for a new wiki? Please share it with us here
User talk:BC
From Lostpedia
Hello, sir:
When you create an entry to the Lostpedia the only requisite is relevance to the LOST mythos, if you happen to know some writing by this woman resembles or helps in any way to understand any mystery please create the articles again. Nothing personal, just making you work extra hard ;) †††GodEmperorOfHell††† --17:58, 26 April 2006 (PDT)
Hey, dude, what do you know? a book by S. K. Nave is titled Here Be Dragons, which is one of the inscriptions in the Blast door Map, please create the article again and mention this fact. †††GodEmperorOfHell††† --18:03, 26 April 2006 (PDT)
I think it's relevant because it has SOMETHING to do with Lost. Every one of these sites are so cryptic that there's no way to tell whether or not it definitively has anything to do with Lost until the show is done, wrapped up, over and all the secrets are revealed. But it's obvious that there is SOMETHING to do with lost on these sites, whether they are fan created or not. Why not let people put some pieces out there so that others might be able to add onto them to help solve the puzzle? Or is that not why this wiki was created? -- BC 18:06, 26 April 2006 (PDT)
hey, dude, simmer down, I'm sorry. watch this and feel free to continue your work, I will go and undo the deletion of the S. K. Nave page, but you gotta promise to expand it. do we have a deal? †††GodEmperorOfHell††† --18:09, 26 April 2006 (PDT)
Deal. -- BC 18:09, 26 April 2006 (PDT)
Great Work!
The entry on S.K. Nave looks great. It turned out a really interesting read. Thank you for your interest! †††GodEmperorOfHell††† --16:51, 27 April 2006 (PDT)
No problem. I still have a TON more to add, and I also want to make pages for that "Crackpot" Herb Rogers and the other links on this little cluster of sites. There's still a lot here to figure out and to organize. Thanks for bearing with me. -- BC 13:22, 28 April 2006 (PDT)
non-canon
The problem arises when you start editing stuff you got from a non-canon source to a canon article, just keep the non-canon separated from canon. --skks 03:00, 29 April 2006 (PDT)
