User talk:01lander

From Lostpedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Spoilers

I really wish you wouldn't post spoilers on character pages. I accidentally read what you posted on Naomi Dorrit's page. I already fixed it. Nobody read his changes until after 3x22 airs. Can someone please ban this guy, it seems like he's been nothing but trouble.


Nicknames list...

Why did you end up deleting half the nickname list? Was this a mistake? --PandoraX 04:48, 3 November 2006 (PST)


Spec

Hey I've reverted your edits on all the male character pages, as just putting "they'll come out" is speculation, not a theory. Whilst I also listened to the official podcast where they said there might be a gay character emerging, its something for the forums not main articles, unless of course you provide evidence for your claims which in regards to people like Hurley or Jack I don't really see at the moment --Nickb123 (Talk) 11:55, 11 November 2006 (PST)

New sections

Hi. Please add new sections at the end of a talk page. You can add a new section using the "+" tab right next to "edit", without having to edit the whole page. And please sign your contributions to talk pages with four tildes (~~~~)--     c      blacxthornE      t     04:22, 6 May 2008 (PDT)

Hi. Basically, what Blacxthorne said. Please be sure to sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by using the Image:button_sig.png button on the edit toolbar. And remember to put new comments at the bottom of the the talk page, not the top. Thanks--TechNic|talk|conts 23:56, 8 May 2008 (PDT)
Hi. Although TechNic has commented on your last entry, I have to add that it's hard to assume good faith about this... I moved and signed your entry. Again. I'm still trying not to assume bad faith. But not only you ignored to do the things I kindly asked you to do, but you also repeated the violations on the same page. Moreover, you did that adding an entry that belongs to the forum, not the talk page, and it kinda looks like it was done just for the hell of it. Which brings me to a side note: The article talk pages are not for ideas about the show; they're for improving the article. Please read the general usage guide; that's three violations in one edit.--     c      blacxthornE      t     01:21, 9 May 2008 (PDT)
I'm the one who corrected your mistakes and kindly asked you not to do them anymore. Why? Do you have any problem with being corrected?--     c      blacxthornE      t     13:09, 9 May 2008 (PDT)
I'm pretty sure I'm not asking you for guidance about my life. I'm asking you to follow the rules when you're contributing. It's not like you've just joined here. You've just been asked to do it right, nothing more. You're insisting on disruption of the talk pages. See this revert.--     c      blacxthornE      t     14:29, 9 May 2008 (PDT)

Please remember to sign your remarks on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~) or by using the Image:button_sig.png button on the edit toolbar. Thanks.--     c      blacxthornE      t     06:24, 16 May 2008 (PDT)

The Other 48 Days

Don't add this episode to anyone's navbar/navbox. Unless you can identify which character had each separate flashback. --Pyramidhead 12:51, 14 May 2008 (PDT)

The point is that the episode is unlike any other in the series so far. Instead of present-time events interspersed by one character's flashbacks, it's a story set completely in the past leading up to an event that already happened in present time. This is why it's nobody's flashback episode per se. In most scenes, you could argue whose POV the story was told from. Would it be Eko remembering Libby consoling him, or Libby remembering talking to him? Anyways, you would have to go add it to all the minor tailies' pages as well, like Donald, Male Tailie, Zach, Emma, etc. --Pyramidhead 21:26, 14 May 2008 (PDT)
I see you changed it back, yet again. The reason it's not anybody's episode is because there is no present narrative - it's a story set in the past, told from an omniscient perspective. If anyone's having a flashback, it's the island, not any of the tailies in particular. Think of this way: you would also have to consider this a "centric" episode for Sawyer, Jin, and Michael, even though they only show up the last few minutes and in recycled footage. It's just easier to think of this as a deviation from the usual pattern. Also, it's generally agreed the opening scene of "A Tale of Two Cities" isn't a Juliet flashback because of the scene pulling back to show the whole island - hence the subsections "Introduction" and "Jack" on the episode page. There's more room for debate on that one, though. If you want to talk about this further, post your reply here on your own talk page, not on mine. --Pyramidhead 17:49, 23 May 2008 (PDT)
Responses to a user should go on the user's talk page, not the user's user page. Also, please make sure to sign your contributions to talk pages by typing four tidles (~~~~). Cheers! Robert K S (talk) 17:30, 14 May 2008 (PDT)
I must say I agree with Pyramidhead. The Other 48 Days revolved around the talies as a whole, so it isn't Eko centric or Ana centric or Libby centric. --CTS 18:08, 24 May 2008 (PDT)

Charlotte Lewis Talk Page

  • Hi. Please do not replace signatures of people with an Unsigned template as you did in this edit. It's clearly for unsigned comments, not for deleting signatures. Editing other people's comments is against policy, as are personal attacks, like using the word "idiot". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blacxthorne (talkcontribs) .

Please review policy

01lander, please review Lostpedia:No personal attacks, and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Robert K S (talk) 12:33, 28 May 2008 (PDT)

Nikki's Deleted Scene

Paulo

What is your source for Paulo's last name? -- Sam McPherson  T  C  16:50, 15 June 2008 (PDT)

Please, supply a link to this interview. -- Sam McPherson  T  C  16:54, 15 June 2008 (PDT)
Okay. Also, a rename tag added to the Paulo page would have been better than copying and pasting the Paulo page to another page and marking the original for deletion. Whenever you get that source, let me know! -- Sam McPherson  T  C  17:06, 15 June 2008 (PDT)
Regardless of if this is true (and I don't believe it is), this is not the correct way to go about it. If you think an article should be renamed, then you should nominate that page for renaming rather than creating a new page and making changes across the site. If you really believe that Paulo shares his name with the Chelsea footballer then you should link to the evidence on the Paulo talk page and start a discussion there for the community to decide.--TechNic|talk|conts 17:13, 15 June 2008 (PDT)
I agree with technic. -- Sam McPherson  T  C  17:17, 15 June 2008 (PDT)
In regards to what he said above this. -- Sam McPherson  T  C  17:21, 15 June 2008 (PDT)
Hey, no one's blaming you. You're not the only one to make this mistake. =] -- Sam McPherson  T  C  17:28, 15 June 2008 (PDT)
Thanks. I appreciate that. -- Sam McPherson  T  C  17:36, 15 June 2008 (PDT)