Talk:Orchid Orientation video

From Lostpedia

I think the thing that fell was a lightbulb or something- whatever was on the top shelf that when the bunny appeared, booted it off the shelf, so it fell :D Phoénix 15:43, 16 May 2008 (PDT)

Contents 1 Is it still a spoiler? 2 Rename or separate article? 3 Actual Orientation film from Episode? 4 Outtakes should be taken out of the title 5 Time discrepancy

Is it still a spoiler?

Since we have seen the Orchid in Lost, should this article still be marked as spoiler?--Kemot from Poland 07:37, 19 May 2008 (PDT)

Agree: The Orchid has been seen in Lost and we even have a logo for it. This film featured on the Season 3 DVD, therefore it should not be considered a spoiler.--Baker1000 05:16, 21 May 2008 (PDT)

Rename or separate article?

Should we rename this now that we have the real film, or should the real film be it's own separate article? --Jackdavinci 23:13, 29 May 2008 (PDT)

I'd say rename this article, and just include a section about the outtakes. --Compossible 23:37, 29 May 2008 (PDT)

Rename: We don't need two articles.--Baker1000 06:18, 30 May 2008 (PDT)

Rename: We've got the actual film now; may as well include both in one single article named for the actual film. Datameister 10:58, 1 June 2008 (PDT)

Rename: Nothing more to add. - TheAma1 12:31, 2 June 2008 (PDT)

Rename - this is a no-brainer. --CTS 19:33, 4 June 2008 (PDT)

Rename: Sure.. --   Steff    talk    contribs    email   14:06, 5 June 2008 (PDT)

• Rename --CTS 21:36, 7 June 2008 (PDT)

Actual Orientation film from Episode?

Any chance we can get the actual Orientation film that Locke watched in "TNPLH parts 2 & 3" on here? Then we can rename the article. --JoeyBags1138 11:16, 31 May 2008 (PDT)

My guess is there would be more of a copyright issue with that, since it's from an actual episode of the show, so we probably can't (I don't know that for sure though). But we could certainly include a transcript and a few screenshots. There's plenty of information that can still be included... enough to make it worthwhile to rename the article and just include a section on the outtakes as well. --Compossible 17:03, 31 May 2008 (PDT)

Outtakes should be taken out of the title

Does anyone else think the word outtakes doesnt belong in the title. I think its better suited as just a sub-section of the "orchid orientation film" article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MattC867 (talk • contribs) 2008-06-01T17:38:35.

Time discrepancy

So I added the time discrepancy section to the article. I decided to place it directly under the video, as opposed to the bottom of the aritcle under trivia or bloopers, for a couple reasons: It isn't related to the Comic Con footage, rather it's commentary on how the footage was presented to the audience in the context of the episode. And I feel that having it close to the video is important, so you can play-n-pause it yourself and check the times. I tried to write it as matter-of-factly as possible to avoid it sounding like a theory (i.e., "OMG!! da Orchid is messn wit time fo realz!!1!") and not deserving to be on the main page. If I made math errors or whatnot, please correct them. Thanks! Kevrock 23:58, 3 June 2008 (PDT)