Talk:Hole
From Lostpedia
Question
Why haven't the survivors gone back to investigate the hole that the security system tried to drag Locke through?
I'm beginning to think we need a page for all the things they are oddly uncurious about. --Doc 09:52, 23 May 2006 (PDT)
That could be redundant; Unanswered Questions. --Meterman 09:56, 23 May 2006 (PDT)
Redundant? Yes and no. The difference is subtle - I'm not asking what that hole was, but rather why havent Jack, Kate, and Lock wondered what that hole was? Kind of like FHenry commenting that Jack and Locke weren't very curous about the age/source of the food. --Doc 10:04, 23 May 2006 (PDT)
Necessary?
Using the word "hole" in dialogue counts as a recurring theme? What about the word "stick," or water, or leaves or something? --Amberjet11 09:57, 23 May 2006 (PDT)
- Agreed. This page is pretty useless.--Piscez 13:26, 27 May 2006 (PDT)
I know it is not up to snuff of the waterfall article.Meterman 12:42, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
This is just a start. When I get around to it I will add actual events about holes-hatches, entries to hatches, Locke being pulled into a hole, etc. I just have quotes for now. And yes, if there are several events and quotes about sticks and water I say that is recurring. But, sticks and water don't.--Meterman 10:01, 23 May 2006 (PDT)
Delete
Delete I too am confused what this page is even about. It seems to take a word and every mention of it, I don't see "hole" as being an overarching theme to our story, nor do I see it as a motif or location, any more than taking a word like "grass" or "rocks". I don't think we need it. The mentions of Hole could be covered in TLE articles Hole2.thehansofoundation.org, Hole3.thehansofoundation.org and Hole4.thehansofoundation.org and the rest are just stringing together random quotes that don't tie together aside from having one word in common. --PandoraX 09:21, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
- Delete, although I kind of like the idea of creating a page for every word spoken on Lost, with all relevant quotes. The "dude" page would be fun, as would the word "lost" itself... --Jajasoon 20:05, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
