Talk:Criticism of Lost

From Lostpedia

references

Good work to everyone involved in this article for thoroughly citing relevant sources! -- ^C¯ _Santa_ ¯^T 00:26, 4 June 2007 (PDT)

Corrections made

Someone had decided that Virgin Media was Sky's parent company, and got a lot of facts plainly wrong, so I've corrected that. I don't think this article should have been article of the week, especially with that glaringly incorrect content. I've also added the criticisms of Season 1 and 2's scheduling, which shows that they have always recieved criticism about their scheduling, even when they just follow the tried and tested formulas of US broadcasting. I don't think I'm the only one who thinks their scheduling criticism is unreasonable and I think the article will now reflect that.  Plkrtn  talk  contribs  email  03:49, 22 August 2007 (PDT)

Featured Article removal

This should NOT be a featured article, it is FULL of inaccuracies, point of view reasoning, has absolutely no defense of these criticisms... Its an abysmal article.  Plkrtn  talk  contribs  email  04:02, 22 August 2007 (PDT)

I've rewritten this article now, and its now just about passable, but oh my, what a bad decision this was. The tense of a lot of the content was all over the place, referring the criticisms of Paulo and Nikki as current, whilst also referring to the characters deaths, meaning that all references to them should be in the past tense. I'm really unhappy this has become a featured article.  Plkrtn  talk  contribs  email  04:13, 22 August 2007 (PDT)

this seems like a pointless article. I really don't care what random critics just writing for a paycheck think about a show they might not even watch. I vote for removal as an article, even though there's no nomination up. --Dorritjo 17:38, 22 August 2007 (PDT)